PDA

View Full Version : FAQ - Olds forged rods and olds pistons questions


Big-Daddy
05-16-2005, 11:46 AM
Ok guys- I need a definate answer on this one.
I'm tearing my 472 down this week. Planning a budget buildup, and hoping for about 600 hp. Got a chevy friend who is gonna port match, clean up, and blend the bowls on my heads. Also match my new edelbrock intake.
My question is spacifically on the swaping of the Oldsmobile rods, and pistons.
I'v been around caddy's long enough to have heard that stock 'olds rods and 403 pistons will go into the engine, but I need more spacific details.

Which rods work with what combinations? 6 3/4 or 7 inch rods, 472 or 500 crank? What kind of compression will I end up with using my '71 472 heads? What oversized 'olds piston sizes will be needed?

The engine will receive a 200 hp nitrous shot, and I'm hoping for about 450 hp on engine, so about 600 total hp. At these levels, forged rods are a must.

But I need definate answers on the rod lengths, piston compression, and cylinder quench so I can select the proper cam, or have it ground [maybe reduced base circle if I need to mill the block for quench]?????????

Really apreciate whatever help someone can provide...

Daryl T.

KJC
05-16-2005, 01:37 PM
7" rods, 403 pistons and a 500 crank will go together and you'll have to deck the block for decent quench, 30-50 thousandths, I think.

Caddycarlo
05-16-2005, 02:41 PM
why do you feel that forged rods are a must? ..... I have been as high a 808 hp on stock pistons and rods though the piston life is questionable the rods did fine ...... I also have run a stock motor with just arp rod bolts a cam and intake and 250 cheater plate .... ran bottles and bottles thru it to the tune of 4 to 6 a week for a very long time and never had any trouble ........ the stock rods with a good bolt and resized with ALs new piston would be a easyer match ...........

MilesO
05-16-2005, 08:48 PM
I am with CaddyCarlo all the way. The Olds combo you have in mind will work but you wind up with a deck height of 10.765 (.049 cut ) which will limit your options of rod/piston combination in the future.

dave_brode
05-17-2005, 05:57 AM
Big-Daddy,

The TRW 403 pistons [in std 4.351" or 4.381"] with 7" olds rods was more popular before the "for caddy" KB pistons existed. As others said, they are too short, but afaik, they were the only non-custom piston option for a pump gas 76cc head 500. Using 1.910" as the stock C.H., the .250" longer rod would want a C.H. of 1.66 to get back to "square one", so the 1.615" tall 403 pistons are at least .045" too short. If the block ins't cut, the quench would be in the .080"-.100" range. Not good, according to most experts.

The 7" olds rods work well with 454 chevy pistons, since most are 1.645" tall. Flat tops can give close to 9-1 with a 120cc head, if the quench is kept tight. You can also buy dished blower pistons for the 454 that *may* work for a pump gas 500 with 76cc heads and a 7" rod. Note - I said *may*. Valve to piston clearance issues may arise, if the valves don't clear into the nothces, but I believe that they will.

They 403 piston/7" rod deal would not work in a 472, since the stock C.H is 2.010" or so. I know of no off the shelf non caddy piston that'll work in a 472 with 7" rods. KB makes a dished caddy 472 piston for a 10-1 CR with 76cc heads, but they are hypers, like the KB dished and flat pistons for the 500. Most experts feel a hyper isn't a good choice for N20.

As far as the 6.735" olds rods, they'll work to replace the 6.75" long caddy rods, with a "for caddy" piston if .015" is cut from the block to get the quench back to where it would be with 6.75" rods. The olds rods must be reamed on the small end to fit the caddy pistons. Eagle olds 6.735" rods are also often used.

Note - most experts feel that the olds rods should be turned 180 degrees when used in the caddy, due to the chamfer on the rods' big end, and the fact that the caddy front to rear head offset is opposite vs the offset on an olds engine.
Dave



Ok guys- I need a definate answer on this one.
I'm tearing my 472 down this week. Planning a budget buildup, and hoping for about 600 hp. Got a chevy friend who is gonna port match, clean up, and blend the bowls on my heads. Also match my new edelbrock intake.
My question is spacifically on the swaping of the Oldsmobile rods, and pistons.
I'v been around caddy's long enough to have heard that stock 'olds rods and 403 pistons will go into the engine, but I need more spacific details.

Which rods work with what combinations? 6 3/4 or 7 inch rods, 472 or 500 crank? What kind of compression will I end up with using my '71 472 heads? What oversized 'olds piston sizes will be needed?

The engine will receive a 200 hp nitrous shot, and I'm hoping for about 450 hp on engine, so about 600 total hp. At these levels, forged rods are a must.

But I need definate answers on the rod lengths, piston compression, and cylinder quench so I can select the proper cam, or have it ground [maybe reduced base circle if I need to mill the block for quench]?????????

Really apreciate whatever help someone can provide...

Daryl T.[/quote]

Al from MTS
05-17-2005, 07:37 AM
I see it alot like Caddy Carlo does. I think stock 500 rods get trash talked more than they should. I have not hit em as hard as he has. I've used them in 600hp N.O.S. sprayed engines and never hurt one. I never spin them past 5200 RPM.
Every time I broke a rod, it was from RPM failure. IMO 5500 and up is gambling big time. 5200 and under has in my experience been bullet proof. Even with a good dose of spray.
For the most part I only use the 455 Olds rods in engines that will be spun past 5500 RPM.

MilesO
05-17-2005, 01:46 PM
Here is a link to the KB site
http://kb-silvolite.com/performance.php?action=diam

A 7" Olds rod (6.998") on a 472 crank will need a comp ht of 1.772". If you will look up KB-206, KB-137, & KB-138 these will have the desired comp ht, but, will need the pin bore diameter of the rod enlarged to fit the piston pin dia.

Also, the question relating to valve / piston top clearence must still be answered as this is not a 'made for it ' combination.

cadillac512
05-17-2005, 05:21 PM
Al,have you experienced rpm related rod failure with stock rods fitted with ARP(or equivalent) bolts? I can hear the "time bomb" engine in the T ticking its life away out there in the shed as I type this..... :roll:
Terry

Big-Daddy
05-17-2005, 06:31 PM
I apreciate all the help everyone. :D

IMO, forged rods are simply the way to go if the option exists, and all other things being equal. I see both the 6.735 and the 7.0 olds rods for sale all the time, and at very reasonable prices on some of the olds web sites... Why not go with them?????

I had my share of pontiacs "back in the old days", and wasted more than one of them due to the cast armasteel rods. Sure, there fine up to a certain power level and RPM, but it's always there in the back of your mind that those darn rods are the weak link in your pride and joy. I just dont want that costing me any sleep.

My local machine shop is where my chevy racer friend works, the one who will be doing the heads and intake for me. He will also be handling the assembly as well. They cut valve releifs in pistons, and we have already discussed these issues.

While were on the subject, am I going to run into any oil supply issues with a reduced base circle cam?

Again, thanks for the help.
Daryl Torres

smalltruckbigcid
05-18-2005, 09:49 PM
Remember, for many of us your doing the CSOB R&D work, so that ticking is all in your imagination......tick tick tick
George

cadillac512
05-19-2005, 05:40 AM
I know,but when I read threads like this one the ticking in my head gets louder.... :lol:
Every time I take it to the track I tell it: Just a few thousand times more down the track and you're done...hang in there. :roll:
Terry
CSOB R&D dept.

STDog
05-19-2005, 07:27 AM
Terry
CSOB R&D dept.

I haven't spent much time on the MTS forums, nor followed performance mods for the big Cadillac engines.

What's CSOB ?

Al from MTS
05-19-2005, 09:11 AM
Terry,
Each time I bust a rod it was always in the same place. Right where they are broached for the rod bolt.
Now I'll shatter another myth. ARP rod bolts.
I never use them in my reconditioned Caddy rods. Only reason we sell them is so many guys ask an insist on them.
I can only say this. In over 10 years of disassembly of hundreds (that's right, HUNDREDS) of Cad engine cores I have NEVER found a failed stock rod bolt. Even stuff guys have heavily abused, over reved, ran out of oil, and so forth. Not one broken stock rod bolt.
EVERY time I have seen rod damage it was RPM related. Seen oval big ends, stretched or twisted beams. This was in engines twisted to 6000 and beyond with stock rods.
I do agree with using forged rods if you have the extra cash. Only because a forged rod bottom end will allow you to up the program down the road. Most rodders end up wanting more power after you get used to what you built. A forged rod bottom end will let you keep upgrading your cam and heads to make the extra power.
A stock rod bottom end would reach a ceiling. After that you are gambling.

~JM~
05-19-2005, 10:13 AM
Terry
CSOB R&D dept.

I haven't spent much time on the MTS forums, nor followed performance mods for the big Cadillac engines.

What's CSOB ?


Ah... Young Grasshopper.



CSOB is not a Thing, nor a Time or a Place...




It is rather a "State of Being".





When you are ready...





You may learn from the Master....



~JM~
New CSOB in training

KJC
05-19-2005, 12:09 PM
Terry,
Each time I bust a rod it was always in the same place. Right where they are broached for the rod bolt.
Now I'll shatter another myth. ARP rod bolts.
I never use them in my reconditioned Caddy rods. Only reason we sell them is so many guys ask an insist on them.
I can only say this. In over 10 years of disassembly of hundreds (that's right, HUNDREDS) of Cad engine cores I have NEVER found a failed stock rod bolt. Even stuff guys have heavily abused, over reved, ran out of oil, and so forth. Not one broken stock rod bolt.
EVERY time I have seen rod damage it was RPM related. Seen oval big ends, stretched or twisted beams. This was in engines twisted to 6000 and beyond with stock rods.
I do agree with using forged rods if you have the extra cash. Only because a forged rod bottom end will allow you to up the program down the road. Most rodders end up wanting more power after you get used to what you built. A forged rod bottom end will let you keep upgrading your cam and heads to make the extra power.
A stock rod bottom end would reach a ceiling. After that you are gambling. Joe sherman said in an interview a few years ago that he had also never seen a rod bolt fail.

dave_brode
05-21-2005, 05:25 PM
Hi Miles,

That dished 460 piston just might work in a 472. The 22cc version should give pump gas CR for a serious effort [with enough cam]. However, the KBs are a no-no with N20, according to most experts. I wonder if Speedpro offers a similar forging?
Dave



O"]Here is a link to the KB site
http://kb-silvolite.com/performance.php?action=diam

A 7" Olds rod (6.998") on a 472 crank will need a comp ht of 1.772". If you will look up KB-206, KB-137, & KB-138 these will have the desired comp ht, but, will need the pin bore diameter of the rod enlarged to fit the piston pin dia.

Also, the question relating to valve / piston top clearence must still be answered as this is not a 'made for it ' combination.

[/quote]

MilesO
05-21-2005, 09:12 PM
Hi, Dave,
I just looked on Jegs site via Google for Speed Pro and found nothing additional. However, SRP has a 460 Ford -3cc flat top w/1.770 ch yielding 9.6 :1 cr w/97cc chamber. # 867-150723 @ $485.
Al may be able to order these as well direct from SRP.

Campbellenterprises.com has many brands listed but may be upgrading their site info as Ford and Chev listings were not accessable.

The 472 stroke with the 6.998 Olds rod = 1.72 r/s ratio which is favorable and compatable with 1.772 ch pistons. Would be a great street combo with a properly speced cam & decent set of heads.

I'd still like to build that 'soft head ' design Larry Widmer wrote of on his site.

Miles

dave_brode
05-22-2005, 06:43 AM
Miles,

Realize that the compression data is meaningless, for anything but a 460 inch engine with a 97cc chamber. I'm guessing that a 4.360" bore and 3cc notch flat top in a tight quench 472 would give somewhere around 8.5-1 with 120cc and 12-1 or more with 76cc. Might work with 425 heads.....
Dave


O"]Hi, Dave,
I just looked on Jegs site via Google for Speed Pro and found nothing additional. However, SRP has a 460 Ford -3cc flat top w/1.770 ch yielding 9.6 :1 cr w/97cc chamber. # 867-150723 @ $485.
Al may be able to order these as well direct from SRP.

Campbellenterprises.com has many brands listed but may be upgrading their site info as Ford and Chev listings were not accessable.

The 472 stroke with the 6.998 Olds rod = 1.72 r/s ratio which is favorable and compatable with 1.772 ch pistons. Would be a great street combo with a properly speced cam & decent set of heads.

I'd still like to build that 'soft head ' design Larry Widmer wrote of on his site.

Miles[/quote]

Big-Daddy
05-25-2005, 04:37 PM
Excellent Guys, thanks a lot!
I'v got it all torn apart, turns out it was broken rings in the #5 hole.
Darn thing blowing blue smoke everywhere, cant wait to get it back together. I'v already bought a set of olds rods [used] and I'm researching which pistons to use. Looks like the BBC's will win out, but I'll look into 460's B4 I make a final decision.

Again, thanks!

Big-Daddy
07-07-2005, 05:52 PM
It's nearly done :D
Turned out one of the heads were cracked, bought a 75 model 500 for the heads and crank.
Went with the BBC pistons, as far as we can calculate, about 9.2:1 final compression with a .020 decking and 3.5cc valve releifs cut into each slug.
Just wanted to thank everyone again for the input.
Daryl Tores